Re: [PATCH] ARM: Fix the "WFI" instruction opcode definition.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6 November 2012 11:24, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> BTW, if mach-exynos includes ARMv8 later?...ARMv8 platform codes will be put
> in the arch/arm/ or arch/arm/64/ if some platform codes share with ARMv7?
> Just wondering...

If mach-exynos would support ARMv8 at some point, I would expect most
of the code to go under various drivers/ subsystems (mfd, power etc.).
I don't see any point in using opcodes. For wfi just use a macro or
cpu_do_idle() (as Rob said, it does the required dsb as well).

I'm also pushing for a standard hotplug.c implementation that is
shared by multiple platforms and uses the power state coordination
interface implemented by the firmware.

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux