Hi, On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 07:12:36PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote: > This patchset is based on the work by Praveen Paneri for > samsung-usbphy driver: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/12653 > > Changes from v2: > - Using "EXYNOS5_PHY_" as common prefix along with exact names for > PHY SFRs for register definitions > - Using register names with bit macros to make things more clear. > - Removed parentheses around 0x230 in definition for EXYNOS5_USB_CFG > in [patch 2/4 v2]. > > Tested on smdk5250 target with usb-next branch along with arch patches > for exynos5250: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/13042 > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/13048 > > Vivek Gautam (4): > usb: phy: samsung: Add host phy support to samsung-phy driver > ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling samsung-usbphy driver > USB: ehci-s5p: Add phy driver support > USB: ohci-exynos: Add phy driver support I really don't know what to do with this series. I know it depends on the other PHY changes which I have in my queue, but it touches too much arch specific code, plus the USB Host code which I don't maintain. On top of all that, I have no platform to test these patches, which makes me even more worried about signing off under this series ;-) Would it be ok if we delay this to v3.9 ? At least the dependency with other PHY changes would be dropped by then. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
