Hi Vinod,
Thanks for reviewing.
On 24 October 2012 09:35, Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 15:47 +0530, Inderpal Singh wrote:
>> The allocated memory for peripheral channels is not being freed upon
>> failure in probe and in module's remove funtion. It will lead to memory
>> leakage. Hence free the allocated memory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh <inderpal.singh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/dma/pl330.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/pl330.c b/drivers/dma/pl330.c
>> index 2ebd4cd..10c6b6a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/pl330.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/pl330.c
>> @@ -2962,7 +2962,7 @@ pl330_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
>> ret = dma_async_device_register(pd);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(&adev->dev, "unable to register DMAC\n");
>> - goto probe_err4;
>> + goto probe_err5;
>> }
>>
>> dev_info(&adev->dev,
>> @@ -2975,6 +2975,8 @@ pl330_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>> +probe_err5:
>> + kfree(pdmac->peripherals);
>> probe_err4:
>> pl330_del(pi);
>> probe_err3:
>> @@ -3025,6 +3027,7 @@ static int __devexit pl330_remove(struct amba_device *adev)
>> res = &adev->res;
>> release_mem_region(res->start, resource_size(res));
>>
>> + kfree(pdmac->peripherals);
>> kfree(pdmac);
>>
>> return 0;
>
> This looks fine, but if you use devm_ functions then you dont need to do
> all this.
> Can you do that conversion instead?
>
Good point.
I will do the conversion and send it again.
Regards,
Inder
> --
> Vinod Koul
> Intel Corp.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
