Rahul Sharma wrote: > > Mr. Park, > > Looks good to me. > Shall I divide the patch-set into two groups and re-post them? > No, you don't need to divide this series. It should be OK to be sent to upstream via Samsung tree. But see my small comments on your patch before that. BTW, I'm not sure about 6th patch which removes to support non-DT for exynos4210 in Samsung tree because as you commented on the patch, the removed code should be replaced by corresponding patch is in exynos drm driver. So I think, topic branch I will provide for exynos drm tree can be a way to solve it. Or Kyungmin's suggestion can be a way for it too. Let you know which one is better...when I pick this up in my tree. > regards, > Rahul Sharma. > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Kyungmin Park > <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It's common case, one topic but two different tree. > > So I suggest merge it at samsung sub-soc tree and drm parts will be > > merged after arm-soc tree is merged. since arm-soc tree collect arm > > soc-soc and merged early at merge window. then drm tree will be merged > > later. > > Until that time, drm patches are hold only at local git. > > > > How do you think? > > Kyungmin, thanks for your suggestion :) Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |