RE: [PATCH v3 0/6] arm: exynos: add dt based support for exynos5 hdmi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rahul Sharma wrote:
> 
> Mr. Park,
> 
> Looks good to me.
> Shall I divide the patch-set into two groups and re-post them?
> 
No, you don't need to divide this series. It should be OK to be sent to
upstream via Samsung tree. But see my small comments on your patch before
that.

BTW, I'm not sure about 6th patch which removes to support non-DT for
exynos4210 in Samsung tree because as you commented on the patch, the
removed code should be replaced by corresponding patch is in exynos drm
driver. So I think, topic branch I will provide for exynos drm tree can be a
way to solve it. Or Kyungmin's suggestion can be a way for it too. Let you
know which one is better...when I pick this up in my tree.

> regards,
> Rahul Sharma.
> 
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Kyungmin Park
> <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It's common case, one topic but two different tree.
> > So I suggest merge it at samsung sub-soc tree and drm parts will be
> > merged after arm-soc tree is merged. since arm-soc tree collect arm
> > soc-soc and merged early at merge window. then drm tree will be merged
> > later.
> > Until that time, drm patches are hold only at local git.
> >
> > How do you think?
> >

Kyungmin, thanks for your suggestion :)

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux