Re: [PATCH 10/16] pinctrl: samsung: Do not pass gpio_chip to pin_to_reg_bank

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 10 of October 2012 09:42:10 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The pointer to gpio_chip passed to pin_to_reg_bank utility function is
> > used only to retrieve a pointer to samsung_pinctrl_drv_data structure.
> > 
> > This patch modifies the function and its users to pass a pointer to
> > samsung_pinctrl_drv_data directly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Looks good, can it be applied without the others?

Yes, I think this one should apply fine.

> Maybe you can make a patch series without all the
> stuff moving register offsets to the DT so I can begin
> with merging that and we can discuss the movement
> of register info separately?

I already considered this approach, but it introduces some problems, as I 
mentioned in my other replies.

Best regards,
-- 
Tomasz Figa
Samsung Poland R&D Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux