On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Inderpal Singh <inderpal.singh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 26 September 2012 15:02, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Inderpal Singh >> <inderpal.singh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> How about conditionally DMA_TERMINATE_ALL and free resources like below ? >>> >>> @@ -3017,9 +3017,11 @@ static int __devexit pl330_remove(struct >>> amba_device *adev) >>> /* Remove the channel */ >>> list_del(&pch->chan.device_node); >>> >>> - /* Flush the channel */ >>> - pl330_control(&pch->chan, DMA_TERMINATE_ALL, 0); >>> - pl330_free_chan_resources(&pch->chan); >>> + if (pch->chan.client_count != 0) { >>> + /* Flush the channel */ >>> + pl330_control(&pch->chan, DMA_TERMINATE_ALL, 0); >>> + pl330_free_chan_resources(&pch->chan); >>> + } >>> } >>> >> It is perfectly safe to flush the channels that have client_count == 0 >> as well. Which is already the case. > > As per my understanding, if client_count ==0, It may mean following: > > 1. This channel was never allocated to any client. Hence > alloc_chan_resources was not done for it. > So, no need to flush and free resources if it was never allocated at > the first place. If we free_chan_resources, it will not be balanced > against alloc_chan_resources. Scenario: insmod and then rmmod. > > Or, > > 2. The channel was allocated to some client, alloc_chan_resource was > done, the work for the client is completed and free_chan_resources was > performed. Now since resources have already been freed, no need to > flush and free_chan_resources again in remove. > > The whole idea of this patch is to balance alloc_chan_resources and > free_chan_resources. > Do you see any issue with channels that have zero client_count ? AFAIU there are already enough checks in the path to weed out unused channels, so let us please not uglify the code by adding new unnecessary checks. thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html