Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
>
> This patch adds platform drm-device node to the dtsi file
>
> Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 4 ++++
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> index 6401c94..f0cc06d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> @@ -495,4 +495,8 @@
> reg = <0x14400000 0x40000>;
> interrupts = <18 5>, <18 4>, <18 6>;
> };
> +
> + drm-device {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos-drm-device";
> + };
> };
> --
Please check below comments from Thomas Abraham and I agree with his
opinion.
There cannot be a node that represents a virtual device. Device tree should
ideally describe the hardware but the above node does not represent a
hardware device. The creation of the platform device instance for the above
device should handled inside the kernel code.
Thanks.
K-Gene <kgene@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
