Hi, On 09/19/2012 07:47 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 19 2012, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> We could just check if the regulator provides the capability to change the >> voltage. >> >> I don't see any direct way of querying the regulator for provided >> capabilities (correct me if I'm just blind), but calling >> regulator_count_voltages() on the regulator and checking if the returned >> value is 1 should be enough to assume that the regulator is fixed. > > Sounds good, I agree. Are you able to test that the obvious patch below > works on your fixed-regulator board? > > Jaehoon and Adrian, can you think of any reason why we shouldn't replace > MMC_CAP2_BROKEN_VOLTAGE with the regulator_count_voltages() call below? > Thanks. I think this is better than using MMC_CAP2_BROKEN_VOLTAGE. I tested with this..and working fine. Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c > index 044cd01..a3cc740 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c > @@ -1132,7 +1132,7 @@ int mmc_regulator_set_ocr(struct mmc_host *mmc, > */ > voltage = regulator_get_voltage(supply); > > - if (mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_BROKEN_VOLTAGE) > + if (regulator_count_voltages(supply) == 1) > min_uV = max_uV = voltage; > > if (voltage < 0) > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |