On 09/06/2012 05:14 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote: > On 6 September 2012 15:43, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Thomas, >> >> On Thursday 06 of September 2012 14:53:01 Thomas Abraham wrote: >>> compatible = "samsung,s3c2440-i2c"; >>> reg = <0x13860000 0x100>; >>> interrupts = <0 58 0>; >>> + pinctrl-names = "default"; >>> + pinctrl-0 = <&i2c0_bus>; >> >> If pinctrl-names property is omitted then the state index is used as a name >> (e.g. pinctrl-0 would be named "0"). Maybe it would be better to use this >> approach (with respective adjustment in first patch)? What do you think? > > I tend to prefer to name the states because it is easier to > cross-reference code and dts files. i2c was a simple one, but for mmc > controllers, there will 1-bit state, 4-bit state and 8-bit state, and > it will be nicer to name then accordingly. So I prefer to use names > but if there is wider consensus on not using names, we can drop names. I would only expect to see multiple states defined in a single board .dts file /if/ runtime muxing is required. Given MMC doesn't runtime mux, I wouldn't expect there to be multiple states for different bus widths; it's just that the "default" state would point at whatever single configuration is appropriate for the board. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |