On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > chained_irq_enter/exit() already mask&ack/unmask the chained interrupt. > There is no need to also explicitly do it in the handler. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 7 ------- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c > index 4eb39cd..0a85aec 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c > @@ -965,14 +965,7 @@ static void exynos_irq_eint0_15(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) > struct irq_chip *chip = irq_get_chip(irq); > > chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); > - chip->irq_mask(&desc->irq_data); > - > - if (chip->irq_ack) > - chip->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data); > - > generic_handle_irq(*irq_data); > - > - chip->irq_unmask(&desc->irq_data); > chained_irq_exit(chip, desc); > } > > -- > 1.7.7.3 > Acked-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |