Hi Laurent, On 07/26/2012 04:54 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Wednesday 18 July 2012 21:53:34 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >> I think we need a one combined RFC and continue discussions in one thread. > > Agreed. > >> Still, our proposals are quite different, but I believe we need something >> in between. I presume we should focus more to have common bindings for >> subdevs that are reused among different host/ISP devices, i.e. sensors and >> encoders. For simple host interfaces we can likely come up with common >> binding patterns, but more complex processing pipelines may require >> a sort of individual approach. >> >> The suspend/resume handling is still something I don't have an idea >> on how the solution for might look like.. >> Instantiating all devices from a top level driver could help, but it >> is only going to work when platforms are converted to the common clock >> framework and have their clocks instantiated from device tree. >> >> This week I'm out of office, and next one or two I have some pending >> assignments. So there might be some delay before I can dedicate some >> reasonable amount of time to carry on with that topic. >> >> I unfortunately won't be attending KS this time. > > That's bad news :-( I still think this topic should be discussed during KS, I Yeah, shit happens.. :) I guess -ENOBUDGET this time... I didn't really plan early to attend KS, I might be coming to ELCE though. However it's a rather distant event and we'll probably get most things settled by that time. > expect several developers to be interested. The media workshop might not be > the best venue though, as we might need quite a lot of time. > > Until KS let's continue the discussion by e-mail. OK, thank you for taking time to review the RFCs. -- Regards, Sylwester -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |