On 07/20/2012 07:47 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Thomas Abraham wrote: >> >> On 19 July 2012 20:58, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi Thomas, >>> >>> I think not good that added the samsung specific code into dw_mmc- >> pltfm.c >>> How about separating to dw-mmc-exynos.c? >> >> I am not sure of this. The only samsung specific code in >> dw_mmc-pltfm.c file is the data for of_device_id instances. The clock >> lookup added into this file in the 3rd patch does not cause any harm >> on non-samsung SoC's which might not define those clocks (on clock >> lookup failure, there are only warning printed, the driver's probe >> does not fail. >> > I agree with Thomas' opinion, in addition, the dw_mmc-pltfm.c file can > support that, so adding dw-mmc-exynos.c is not needed now. > >> I would prefer not to add separate file for Exynos SoC's for now. >> Splitting into different files will need to defined new callbacks >> which I fell is not really required. Then where is the callback function located? Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung >> > Yes. > > Thanks. > > Best regards, > Kgene. > -- > Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer, > SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |