Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:21:47AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Note that the point of the DEFINE_RES_*() macros is really to prevent > > people from coming up with new silly macros to do the same thing, as > > we've had in the past. > > One of the other reaons was to stop the stream of resources with wrong > endings (because people kept thinking it was exclusive rather than > inclusive) - and the resulting stream of additional patches to fix those > errors. > > The legacy platforms do have those kinds of errors - when I converted > SA11x0 as part of a previous patch set, I found a number suffering from > this error. (Were any found in this patch set? I've not read through > it.) > > I think if this becomes a small %age of the change to Samsung stuff, > and Kukjin is happy with it, it should go in. Yes, agree. I will apply this whole series. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |