On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Thomas Abraham
<thomas.abraham@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Some platforms allow for clock gating and control of bus interface unit clock
> and card interface unit clock. Add support for clock lookup of optional biu
> and ciu clocks for clock gating and clock speed determination.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index 1532357..036846f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -1938,19 +1938,35 @@ int dw_mci_probe(struct dw_mci *host)
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> - if (!host->pdata->bus_hz) {
> + host->biu_clk = clk_get(&host->dev, "biu");
> + if (IS_ERR(host->biu_clk))
> + dev_info(&host->dev, "biu clock not available\n");
> + else
> + clk_enable(host->biu_clk);
> +
> + host->ciu_clk = clk_get(&host->dev, "ciu");
> + if (IS_ERR(host->ciu_clk))
> + dev_info(&host->dev, "ciu clock not available\n");
Should these printks be at debug level? I'm not 100% sure either way
but it could be a little noisy on systems that do not use these
clocks.
> + else
> + clk_enable(host->ciu_clk);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(host->ciu_clk))
> + host->bus_hz = host->pdata->bus_hz;
> + else
> + host->bus_hz = clk_get_rate(host->ciu_clk);
> +
> + if (!host->bus_hz) {
> dev_err(&host->dev,
> "Platform data must supply bus speed\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_clk;
> }
>
> - host->bus_hz = host->pdata->bus_hz;
> host->quirks = host->pdata->quirks;
>
> spin_lock_init(&host->lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&host->queue);
>
> -
> host->dma_ops = host->pdata->dma_ops;
> dw_mci_init_dma(host);
>
> @@ -2095,6 +2111,13 @@ err_dmaunmap:
> regulator_disable(host->vmmc);
> regulator_put(host->vmmc);
> }
> + kfree(host);
> +
> +err_clk:
> + clk_disable(host->ciu_clk);
> + clk_disable(host->biu_clk);
> + clk_put(host->ciu_clk);
> + clk_put(host->biu_clk);
Are these calls safe, or do we need to check IS_ERR as above?
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dw_mci_probe);
> @@ -2128,6 +2151,10 @@ void dw_mci_remove(struct dw_mci *host)
> regulator_put(host->vmmc);
> }
>
> + clk_disable(host->ciu_clk);
> + clk_disable(host->biu_clk);
> + clk_put(host->ciu_clk);
> + clk_put(host->biu_clk);
Likewise.
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dw_mci_remove);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
> index 7a7ebd3..fa9a139 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
> @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ struct mmc_data;
> * @data_offset: Set the offset of DATA register according to VERID.
> * @dev: Device associated with the MMC controller.
> * @pdata: Platform data associated with the MMC controller.
> + * @biu_clk: Pointer to bus interface unit clock instance.
> + * @ciu_clk: Pointer to card interface unit clock instance.
> * @slot: Slots sharing this MMC controller.
> * @fifo_depth: depth of FIFO.
> * @data_shift: log2 of FIFO item size.
> @@ -158,6 +160,8 @@ struct dw_mci {
> u16 data_offset;
> struct device dev;
> struct dw_mci_board *pdata;
> + struct clk *biu_clk;
> + struct clk *ciu_clk;
> struct dw_mci_slot *slot[MAX_MCI_SLOTS];
>
> /* FIFO push and pull */
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
