On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:45:07PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 30 March 2012, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > +- cd-inverted: when present, polarity on the wp gpio line is inverted > > > +- wp-inverted: when present, polarity on the wp gpio line is inverted > > I'm not sure about those two: Some of the GPIO bindings have flags in > > the GPIO specifier (Tegra, ARM PL061, gpio.txt mentions the possibility > > of polarity being in the specifier), and bit 0 of the flags is used to > > indicate inversion. I think that either we should rely on GPIO > > specifiers having such flags and remove these xxx-inverted properties > > from the MMC binding, or remove that flag bit from the GPIO bindings. > Maybe the GPIO maintainer can comment on this. My understanding is > that not all gpio controllers support this in their bindings. If they > do, I agree that we can remove the extra properties here. Surely it'd be better to fix this at the GPIO controller end rather than having a patchwork of approaches? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |