Dear Mr. Kim, On 9 March 2012 22:02, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02/22/12 04:14, Thomas Abraham wrote: >> >> Changes since v2: >> - Reworked irq domain support based on v5 of the irq_domain generalization >> patches. >> >> Changes since v1: (only patch 4/4 has changes) >> - Fixes based on Rob's comments: >> a. Fixed the function prototype of exynos4_init_irq_eint(void) >> b. Included interrupt-parent as an optional property for wakeup >> interrupt >> controller node. >> >> Samsung Exynos4 includes 32 external wakeup interrupt sources. The first >> 16 >> of these interrupts are connected to GIC SPI[31:16]. The last 16 of these >> interrupts are grouped together into one interrupt and connected to GIC >> SPI[32]. >> >> This patchset adds irq domain and device tree support for these >> interrupts. >> Since there are users of fixed linux irq numbers of the external wakeup >> interrupts, the legacy mapping is used for the irq domain. >> >> This patchset is based on >> http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git >> [for-next] >> >> with all irq_domain (v5) patches merged from >> http://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git [irqdomain/next] >> >> This patchset should be applied after applying the following patch. >> [PATCH] ARM: Exynos: Add irq domain and device tree support for interrupt >> combiner > > > Looks ok to me this series, but I lost above patch in my mail box. > Thomas, could you please send updated it so that I can apply this series? The device tree support patches for wakeup interrupts and interrupt combiner do not apply cleanly to the for-next branch due to the Exynos5 additions. So I will rebase, test and post an updated version of these patches. Thanks, Thomas. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |