On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:03:31PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > On 03/07/2012 01:30 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > The same IP is present and used with the same driver on other Samsung > > SoCs. > I know that used with the same driver on other Samsung-SoCs(S3C64XX/S3C24XX..etc) > I just only used the interface in sdhci-pltfm.c. Nothing difference.. > Why do you think that will break the other SoC? > Header file(/plat/regs-sdhci.h) also is only used in sdhci-s3c.c. > And the least portion is moved into /linux/mmc/. > Then included "linux/mmc/sdhci-s3c.h" in plat/sdhci.h. > What's difference? > If you can explain the more detail, i can understand. > But sorry, now i didn't accept your opinion. To be honest I didn't read the series, the diffstat looks so obviously problematic as you're touching the setup-gpio- files for only a subset of Samsung architectures - there's been quite regular issues with updates for newer SoCs breaking support for s3c64xx. I also notice that this will conflict with the series I've previously posted for runtime PM support which would push us even further back from being able to use the lower power WFI modes in mainline :( Though hopefully that'll be easier to fix.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
