From: Hiroshi DOYU <hdoyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 9/9] ARM: dma-mapping: add support for IOMMU mapper
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 08:09:52 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <20120307.080952.2152478004740487196.hdoyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> From: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [PATCHv7 9/9] ARM: dma-mapping: add support for IOMMU mapper
> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 23:48:42 +0100
> Message-ID: <401E54CE964CD94BAE1EB4A729C7087E37970113FE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > > > +struct dma_iommu_mapping *
> > > > +arm_iommu_create_mapping(struct bus_type *bus, dma_addr_t base, size_t size,
> > > > + int order)
> > > > +{
> > > > + unsigned int count = (size >> PAGE_SHIFT) - order;
> > > > + unsigned int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(count) * sizeof(long);
> >
> > The count calculation doesn't seem correct. "order" is log2 number and
> > size >> PAGE_SHIFT is number of pages.
> >
> > If size is passed as 64*4096(256KB) and order is 6(allocation granularity is 2^6 pages=256KB),
> > just 1 bit is enough to manage allocations. So it should be 4 bytes or one long.
>
> Good catch!
>
> > But the calculation gives count = 64 - 6 = 58 and
> > Bitmap_size gets set to (58/(4*8)) * 4 = 8 bytes, which is incorrect.
>
> "order" isn't the order of size passed, which is minimal *page*
> allocation order which client decides whatever, just in case.
>
> > It should be as follows.
> > unsigned int count = 1 << get_order(size) - order;
To be precise, as below?
unsigned int count = 1 << (get_order(size) - order);
> > unsigned int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(count) * sizeof(long) * BITS_PER_BYTE;
> >
> > -KR
> >
> > --nvpublic
> >
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
