On Thursday 09 February 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Will Deacon wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 08:50:23AM +0000, Olof Johansson wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > As I remember only DT based board file is acceptable for mainline? > > > > > > For a new SoC family like 5250 it would be much preferred to only add > > > device-tree enabled boards. > > > As I commented, I'd like to support both dt and non-dt for EXYNOS5250 and > I'm saying EXYNOS5250 DT patches will be submitted next time again. I think it would be much better to start with just the DT based platform for exynos5 and leave out the atag based platform. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |