On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:44:20AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> This patch really needs some kind of explanation. It's far from obvious from the casual reader why moving from a fixed value of 200Hz for the kernel tick rate to a range from 32 to 1024 would be legal. If 100Hz was possible before, and that's the architecture default, why was 200Hz chosen instead? And is 99Hz and 101Hz allowable? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |