On 01/29/2012 12:57 AM, Olof Johansson : > Hi, > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> And we're now there. So... >> >> Arnd, Olaf, >> >> Please incorporate the latest ARM (for-armsoc branch) changes, which can be found at: >> >> git://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/kernel/git-cur/linux-arm.git for-armsoc >> >> with SHA1 dcf81c1af839b77b44404453ecae6e5ac5a75f05. > > Thanks. I have added this as depends/rmk/for-armsoc in the arm-soc repo. > > Any next/ branch we start will have this as the base of said branch, > so any vendor branches must either already be developed against this > stable branch, or merge on top of this with minimal conflicts. Ok, great. I just let you know that there is a conflict between the current Linus' tree (with recently updated at91 fixes) and this rmk/for-armsoc branch. I can give you the resolution of this conflict easily but I would like to know which way I execute the merge: I use this rmk/for-armsoc as a baseline and merge the fixes already in Linus' tree on top of it or the other way around? Maybe it is preferable that I wait for 3.3-rc2 and merge rmk/for-armsoc on top of it. This result can be the base of our AT91 work for 3.4 preparation. Your thought? Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |