Hi,
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Olof Johansson wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
> Hi Olof,
>
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Mark Brown
>> <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 05:21:02PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> >
>> >> Mark, Kukjin, can either of you split out the fixes in a separate
>> branch?
>> >
>> > Here's some of them, there were a few others I'm aware of that depended
>> > on feature updates. Ideally we'd actually get all the changes that have
>> > been in -next in.
>> >
>> > The following changes since commit
>> 5f0a6e2d503896062f641639dacfe5055c2f593b:
>> >
>> > Linux 3.2-rc7 (2011-12-23 21:51:06 -0800)
>> >
>> > are available in the git repository at:
>> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/misc.git
>> fixes/samsung
>> >
>> > Mark Brown (5):
>> > ARM: SAMSUNG: Fix GPIO space reservation for S3C64xx platforms
>> > ARM: S3C64XX: Correct reservation of GPIOs for CPU module on
>> Cragganmore
>>
>> The above two don't seem to have been in the branch that was sent by
>> Kukjin, it had:
>>
>> ARM: EXYNOS: Invert VCLK polarity for framebuffer on ORIGEN
>> ARM: S3C64XX: Fix interrupt configuration for PCA935x on Cragganmore
>> ARM: S3C64XX: Fix the memory mapped GPIOs on Cragganmore
>> ARM: S3C64XX: Remove hsmmc1 from Cragganmore
>> ARM: S3C64XX: Remove unconditional power domain disables
>> ARM: SAMSUNG: Declare struct platform_device in plat/s3c64xx-spi.h
>> ARM: SAMSUNG: dma-ops.h needs mach/dma.h
>> ARM: SAMSUNG: Guard against multiple inclusion of plat/dma.h
>>
>> I've pulled the branch from him.
>>
> No, please drop it because above you said are in mainline now.
>
> - commit 4ff13995("ARM: SAMSUNG: Fix GPIO space reservation for S3C64xx
> platforms")
> - commit aaed44e1("ARM: S3C64XX: Correct reservation of GPIOs for CPU module
> on Cragganmore")
>
> Seems to be merged via arm-soc/next/boards and there was some
> mis-communications.
> (Refer to the commit 8df97495 ("Merge branch 'samsung/board' into
> next/boards"))
>
> Sorry for bothering.
Ok, no worries, thanks for checking.
>> Kukjin, please consider picking up the missing two patches above and
>> send another pull request with those and any other needed fixes.
>>
> As I said, please ignore next-samsung-devel-samsung and Mark's
> fixes/samsung.
> I think, you can go ahead with my previous pull request, samsung-fixes.
Done, it was in the batch I just sent a request to Linus for.
-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
