On Monday, January 02, 2012, Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 08:13:19PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Monday, December 12, 2011, Thomas Abraham wrote: > > > A device node pointer is added to generic pm domain structure to associate > > > the domain with a node in the device tree. > > > > That sounds fine except for one thing: PM domains are not devices, so adding > > "device node" pointers to them is kind of confusing. Perhaps there should be > > something like struct dt_node, representing a more general device tree node? > > struct device_node has nothing to do with struct device. device_node is a > generic device tree node. So the name is kind of confusing. :-) > Thomas' approach is fine. Well, I guess so. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |