Mark Brown wrote:
>
> 0 is a valid IRQ but the interrupt line for the pca935x certainly isn't
> connected there which causes it to fail to probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c
> index 46dfb14..139d16e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c
> @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static struct platform_device *crag6410_devices[]
> __initdata = {
>
> static struct pca953x_platform_data crag6410_pca_data = {
> .gpio_base = PCA935X_GPIO_BASE,
> - .irq_base = 0,
> + .irq_base = -1,
> };
>
> /* VDDARM is controlled by DVS1 connected to GPK(0) */
> --
> 1.7.7.3
OK, so do you want to apply this before v3.2?
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
