On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As I commented, looks ok to me and will apply patches not pull and since I > didn't get your answer to ask 'topic branch is required for this', I didn't > yet. > > As a note, if there is no reason to create based on not -rc, just use -rc. > > Merry Christmas. > Thanks. > Hello, Having a topic branch for devfreq is fine and I don't care whether there is one or not as long as the required registers are supported. Because the registers added in the patches do not seem to be devfreq specific, I don't think we should have another branch for this. Thus, having the patches in your Exynos' branch is also fine. I'll let future pull-requested branches be rebased on rcX anyway. Thanks. Cheers! Happy new year! - MyungJoo -- MyungJoo Ham, Ph.D. Mobile Software Platform Lab, DMC Business, Samsung Electronics -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |