Re: [PATCH v4 REPOST 4/5] highbank: Unconditionally require l2x0 L2 cache controller support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 07:37:32AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> 
> On 12/14/2011 05:39 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> > If running in the Normal World on a TrustZone-enabled SoC, Linux
> > does not have complete control over the L2 cache controller
> > configuration.  The kernel cannot work reliably on such platforms
> > without the l2x0 cache support code built in.
> > 
> > This patch unconditionally enables l2x0 support for the Highbank
> > SoC.
> > 
> > Thanks to Rob Herring for this suggestion. [1]
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2011-November/074495.html
> 
> Doesn't this need to be above the SOB? Otherwise:

You may be right ... certainly I see no reason _not_ to change it.
So I'll change it.

> 
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks

---Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux