Hi Dave, Sorry for that I did not look into previous post to point it out. On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:39:41AM +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > The i.MX6 Quad SoC will work without the l2x0 L2 cache controller > support built into the kernel, so this patch removes the dependency > on CACHE_L2X0 and selects MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0 instead. > > This makes the l2x0 support optional, so that it can be turned off > when desired for debugging purposes etc. > > Thanks to Shawn Guo for this suggestion. [1] > > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx> > > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2011-November/074602.html > --- > arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig > index 29a3d61..1fb93f2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig > @@ -609,13 +609,13 @@ comment "i.MX6 family:" > config SOC_IMX6Q > bool "i.MX6 Quad support" > select ARM_GIC > - select CACHE_L2X0 > select CPU_V7 > select HAVE_ARM_SCU > select HAVE_IMX_GPC > select HAVE_IMX_MMDC > select HAVE_IMX_SRC > select HAVE_SMP > + select MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0 The option SOC_IMX6Q is only available when ARCH_IMX_V6_V7 is selected. Since MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0 has been selected by ARCH_IMX_V6_V7 in patch #1, this line seems redundant here. Regards, Shawn > select USE_OF > > help > -- > 1.7.4.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |