On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Javi Merino <javi.merino@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think the best solution would be to revert > ee3f615819404a9438b2dd01b7a39f276d2737f2 and go back to my original > patch (in the beginning of this thread): > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/133110 > > What do you think? Well, we have to resort to that if we can't find something simpler. What do you think about ... diff --git a/arch/arm/common/pl330.c b/arch/arm/common/pl330.c index f407a6b..3a51cdd 100644 --- a/arch/arm/common/pl330.c +++ b/arch/arm/common/pl330.c @@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ int pl330_chan_ctrl(void *ch_id, enum pl330_chan_op op) /* Start the next */ case PL330_OP_START: - if (!_thrd_active(thrd) && !_start(thrd)) + if (_state(thrd) == PL330_STATE_STOPPED && !_start(thrd)) ret = -EIO; break; Thanks -jassi [Sorry I don't have any pl330 platform handy] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |