Hi Mark, On 9 December 2011 10:11, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 09:57:38PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: > > You should be sending this to Samuel for review as it's a MFD patch. Ok. I will Cc Samuel for the v2 of this patchset. > >> Add irq domain support for max8997 interrupts. All uses of irq_base in platform >> data and max8997 driver private data are removed. > > Removing irq_base from platform data isn't going to be helpful for > anyone using the driver on non-DT platforms as it's going to make it > impossible to find the interrupts. All the consumers of the max8997 interrupts are the drivers for the sub-blocks of max8997. These drivers have access to 'irq_domain' member of 'struct max8997_dev', From irq_domain, the sub-block driver can get the irq_base and add one of the 'enum max8997_irq' offset when registering for interrupt notifications. So irq_base from platform data and all uses of it was removed. All max8997 sub-block drivers should use the irq_base of the irq_domain. Thanks for your review. Regards, Thomas. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |