On Saturday, December 03, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:36:19PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, December 02, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > It saves source code size when we get the second user, by itself you're > > > right it doesn't achieve anything (except avoiding redundancy once 1/3 > > > gets applied I guess). > > > But the patch removed useful code without adding any replacements, as far > > as I could see it. > > The first patch in the series added the replacement as generic code, > this patch is deleting the shmobile specific implementation and using > the generic code instead. No, the first patch didn't add any replacements for the functions that the second patch removed. At least I don't see the replacements in the first patch. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |