On 24 November 2011 11:43, Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Girish, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Girish K S [mailto:girish.shivananjappa@xxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 4:12 PM >> To: Subhash Jadavani >> Cc: linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; cjb@xxxxxxxxxx; patches@xxxxxxxxxx; >> linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V4] mmc: core: HS200 mode support for eMMC >> 4.5 >> >> On 19 November 2011 00:29, Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > Hi Girish, >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: linux-mmc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-mmc- >> >> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Girish K S >> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:30 AM >> >> To: linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> Cc: cjb@xxxxxxxxxx; patches@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-samsung- >> >> soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Girish K S >> >> Subject: [PATCH RESEND V4] mmc: core: HS200 mode support for eMMC >> 4.5 >> >> >> >> This patch adds the support of the HS200 bus speed for eMMC 4.5 >> >> devices. >> >> The eMMC 4.5 devices have support for 200MHz bus speed.The mmc core >> and >> >> host modules have been touched to add support for this module. >> >> >> >> It is necessary to know the card type in the sdhci.c file to add >> >> support >> >> for eMMC tuning function. So card.h file is included to import the >> card >> >> data structure. >> > >> > We don't need to know the card type in the host controller driver if >> we pass >> > the command opcode as the 2nd argument to execute_tuning() ops. >> Command >> > opcode can have have either CMD19 or CMD21 as it's value depending on >> the >> > card type (whether it's SD3.0 card or eMMC4.5 card). > > Can you see if we can implement this? I have considered this and made the patch > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> cc: Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Signed-off-by: Girish K S <girish.shivananjappa@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> --- >> >> Changes in v4: >> >> Rebased onto chris-mmc/mmc-next branch. This patch is >> >> successfully >> >> applied on commit with id >> >> de022ed3fdc14808299b2fa66dbb1ed5ab921912. >> >> Changes in v3: >> >> In the previous commits of chris-mmc/mmc-next branch, the >> patch >> >> with >> >> commit id (c0f22a2c92e357e7cb3988b0b13034d70b7461f9) defines >> >> caps2 for >> >> more capabilities. This patch version deletes the member >> >> ext_caps(created >> >> in my earlier patch) from struct mmc_host and reuses already >> >> accepted >> >> caps2 member. >> >> Changes in v2: >> >> Rebased to latest chris-mmc/mmc-next branch. Resolved >> indentation >> >> problems identified in review. This patch has to be applied >> >> before >> >> the patch released for modifying the printk messages. >> >> Changes in v1: >> >> Case statements in switch that produce same result have >> >> been combined to reduce repeated assignments. >> >> patch recreated after rebase to chris balls mmc-next branch. >> >> >> >> drivers/mmc/core/bus.c | 3 +- >> >> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 92 >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- >> >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 36 +++++++++++++++--- >> >> include/linux/mmc/card.h | 3 + >> >> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 6 +++ >> >> include/linux/mmc/mmc.h | 8 +++- >> >> include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h | 1 + >> >> 7 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c >> >> index 46b6e84..2f82f6b 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c >> >> @@ -301,10 +301,11 @@ int mmc_add_card(struct mmc_card *card) >> >> mmc_card_ddr_mode(card) ? "DDR " : "", >> >> type); >> >> } else { >> >> - printk(KERN_INFO "%s: new %s%s%s card at address >> %04x\n", >> >> + pr_info("%s: new %s%s%s%s card at address %04x\n", >> >> mmc_hostname(card->host), >> >> mmc_sd_card_uhs(card) ? "ultra high speed " : >> >> (mmc_card_highspeed(card) ? "high speed " : >> ""), >> >> + (mmc_card_hs200(card) ? "HS200 " : ""), >> >> mmc_card_ddr_mode(card) ? "DDR " : "", >> >> type, card->rca); >> >> } >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c >> >> index 3627044..4db248c 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c >> >> @@ -285,6 +285,39 @@ static int mmc_read_ext_csd(struct mmc_card >> *card, >> >> u8 *ext_csd) >> >> } >> >> card->ext_csd.raw_card_type = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE]; >> >> switch (ext_csd[EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE] & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_MASK) { >> >> + case EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_200 | >> >> + EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_52 | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_26: >> >> + case EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_200 | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_DDR_1_8V | >> >> + EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_52 | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_26: >> >> + case EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_200 | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_DDR_1_2V | >> >> + EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_52 | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_26: >> >> + case EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_200 | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_DDR_52 | >> >> + EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_52 | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_26: >> >> + card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr = 200000000; >> >> + card->ext_csd.card_type = EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_200; >> >> + break; >> >> + case EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_2V | >> >> + EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_52 | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_26: >> >> + case EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_2V | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_DDR_1_8V | >> >> + EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_52 | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_26: >> >> + case EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_2V | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_DDR_1_2V | >> >> + EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_52 | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_26: >> >> + case EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_2V | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_DDR_52 | >> >> + EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_52 | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_26: >> >> + card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr = 200000000; >> >> + card->ext_csd.card_type = EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_2V; >> >> + break; >> >> + case EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_8V | >> >> + EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_52 | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_26: >> >> + case EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_8V | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_DDR_1_8V | >> >> + EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_52 | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_26: >> >> + case EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_8V | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_DDR_1_2V | >> >> + EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_52 | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_26: >> >> + case EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_8V | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_DDR_52 | >> >> + EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_52 | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_26: >> >> + card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr = 200000000; >> >> + card->ext_csd.card_type = EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_8V; >> >> + break; >> > >> > Can't we optimize this? This looks like too many case statements. >> > >> > Basically we can have checks like this: >> > >> > temp = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE] & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_MASK; >> > if ((temp & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_2V == EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_2V) >> || >> > (temp & EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_8V == >> EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_8V)) { >> > card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr = 200000000; >> > card->ext_csd.card_type = EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_2V; /* we >> can have >> > some logic to identify the card type correctly */ >> > } > > Can you please respond to this? Its taken care in the current patch (not submitted) > >> > >> > >> >> case EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_DDR_52 | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_52 | >> >> EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_26: >> >> card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr = 52000000; >> >> @@ -699,6 +732,7 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, >> u32 >> >> ocr, >> >> { >> >> struct mmc_card *card; >> >> int err, ddr = 0; >> >> + int hs_sdr = 0; >> >> u32 cid[4]; >> >> unsigned int max_dtr; >> >> u32 rocr; >> >> @@ -890,11 +924,15 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host >> *host, >> >> u32 ocr, >> >> /* >> >> * Activate high speed (if supported) >> >> */ >> >> - if ((card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr != 0) && >> >> - (host->caps & MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED)) { >> >> - err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL, >> >> - EXT_CSD_HS_TIMING, 1, >> >> - card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time); >> >> + if (card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr != 0) { >> > >> > We should enter into this if condition only if one of the this cap >> > (MMC_CAP2_HIGHSPEED_200 or MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED) is set. >> card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr is non zero for high speed only i.e for >> frequency above 26Mhz. For anything less than 26 Mhz this if >> condition is skipped. > > I guess that's not the correct assumption here. Even for > EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_26 card type we have non zero value hs_max_dtr. Please > check. > > case EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_26: > card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr = 26000000; > pls check the category of 26Mhz (it is considered as High speed). anything below 26 is normal speed. >> So its just enough if we check for less than 52 MHz and >= 52 Mhz. > >> > >> >> + if ((card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr > 52000000) && >> >> + (host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_HIGHSPEED_200)) >> >> + err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL, >> >> + EXT_CSD_HS_TIMING, 2, 0); >> >> + else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED) >> >> + err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL, >> >> + EXT_CSD_HS_TIMING, 1, 0); >> >> + >> >> if (err && err != -EBADMSG) >> >> goto free_card; >> >> >> >> @@ -903,7 +941,10 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, >> >> u32 ocr, >> >> mmc_hostname(card->host)); >> >> err = 0; >> >> } else { >> >> - mmc_card_set_highspeed(card); >> >> + if (card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr > 52000000) >> > >> > I think there should be AND condition with (host->caps2 & >> > MMC_CAP2_HIGHSPEED_200) for setting the card as HS200. >> Ok will add it. >> > >> >> + mmc_card_set_hs200(card); >> >> + else >> >> + mmc_card_set_highspeed(card); >> >> mmc_set_timing(card->host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS); >> > >> > As mentioned earlier, there should be new timing mode defined for >> HS200. >> can you share Host controller specification will check it. > > Our Qualcomm MSM SDCC host controller is not compliant to SDHCI (Standard > Host controller interface) specification so our host controller > implementation won't be same as controllers compliant to SDHCI. It's not > just Qualcomm SDCC controller, there are many other SDCC controller (like > mmci) which are not compliant to SDHCI standard. > > If you check the SD3.0 implementation (sd_set_bus_speed_mode() function in > drivers/mmc/core/sd.c), core layer is setting the different timing modes for > all the different UHS-I bus speed modes (like SDR104, SDR50, DDR50 etc ...). > Then it's upto the host controller driver to see whether they want to make > use this timing mode or not? Our host controller driver does make use of it > for SD3.0 timing modes and similar we need to know HS200 timing mode in > order to program our controller properly. > >Need to check more on this >> > >> >> } >> >> } >> >> @@ -929,7 +970,7 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, >> u32 >> >> ocr, >> >> */ >> >> max_dtr = (unsigned int)-1; >> >> >> >> - if (mmc_card_highspeed(card)) { >> >> + if (mmc_card_highspeed(card) || mmc_card_hs200(card)) { >> >> if (max_dtr > card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr) >> >> max_dtr = card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr; >> >> } else if (max_dtr > card->csd.max_dtr) { >> >> @@ -955,6 +996,22 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, >> >> u32 ocr, >> >> } >> >> >> >> /* >> >> + * Indicate HS200 SDR mode (if supported). >> >> + */ >> >> + if (mmc_card_hs200(card)) { >> >> + if ((card->ext_csd.card_type & >> EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_8V) >> >> + && ((host->caps2 & (MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_8V_SDR | >> >> + MMC_CAP2_HS200)) >> >> + == (MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_8V_SDR | >> > MMC_CAP2_HS200))) >> >> + hs_sdr = MMC_1_8V_SDR_MODE; >> >> + else if ((card->ext_csd.card_type & >> >> EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_2V) >> >> + && ((host->caps2 & (MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_2V_SDR | >> >> + MMC_CAP2_HS200)) >> >> + == (MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_2V_SDR | >> > MMC_CAP2_HS200))) >> >> + hs_sdr = MMC_1_2V_SDR_MODE; >> >> + } >> >> + >> >> + /* >> >> * Activate wide bus and DDR (if supported). >> >> */ >> >> if ((card->csd.mmca_vsn >= CSD_SPEC_VER_4) && >> >> @@ -994,16 +1051,24 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host >> *host, >> >> u32 ocr, >> >> if (!err) { >> >> mmc_set_bus_width(card->host, >> bus_width); >> >> >> >> + if ((host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_HS200) && >> >> + card->host->ops->execute_tuning) >> >> + err = card->host->ops-> \ >> >> + execute_tuning(card- >> >host); >> > >> > execute_tuning() should be executed immediately after the TIMING is >> changed >> > to HS200 and clock speed is changed to 200MHz. But here timing mode >> and >> > clock rate is changed and then you are also sending bus width change >> > command. As host controller timing tuning has not completed, this bus >> width >> > change command may fail with CMD/DATA CRC errors. >> > pls check the eMMC specification section 6.6.4 it says >> "Note that the host should switch to the required bus width before >> starting the tuning operation to >> allow the tuning sequence to be done using the proper bus operating >> conditions. > > Agreed. But specification doesn't when exactly the bus width change should > happen. Right before Step.6 (mentioned in section 6.6.4) or before setting > the HS200 mode in HS_TIMING and changing the clock speed. > > I would say we should set the bus width before the step.1 (mentioned in > section 6.6.4). then proceed to execute all the step.1 and step.6 in > sequence. > > As I had mentioned earlier, let's say at first you set the HS_TIMING=HS200 > and set the clock speed to 200MHz. Now if you try to set the bus width (by > sending the CMD6 and then reading the STATUS via CMD13) without executing > tuning, CMD6/CMD13 may fail with CMD/RESPONSE CRC errors as controller > sampling point is still not tuned. We had exact similar issue faced with > SD3.0 as well on our host controller. You can take a look at this patch: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-arm-msm/msg03867.html > will check again > >> " >> > So basically this should be the sequence. >> > 1. set the bus width depending on the host controller and card >> capability >> > 2. If card support HS200 timing, change the timing of the card by >> sending >> > SWITCH command. Change the clock rate. Change the timing mode of >> controller. >> > 3. Now call the host controller execute_tuning ops to perform the >> controller >> > sampling point tuning. >> > >> > Also, let's pass the command opcode as the 2nd argument of the >> > execute_tuning() function. Which means host controller driver need >> not to >> > know the card type. >> > >> >> + >> >> /* >> >> * If controller can't handle bus >> width >> > test, >> >> * compare ext_csd previously read in >> 1 bit >> >> mode >> >> * against ext_csd at new bus width >> >> */ >> >> - if (!(host->caps & >> MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH_TEST)) >> >> + if (!(host->caps & >> MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH_TEST) >> > && >> >> + !err) >> >> err = >> mmc_compare_ext_csds(card, >> >> bus_width); >> >> - else >> >> + else if (!err) >> >> err = mmc_bus_test(card, >> bus_width); >> >> + else >> >> + pr_warning("tuning execution >> > failed\n"); >> >> if (!err) >> >> break; >> >> } >> >> @@ -1052,6 +1117,15 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host >> *host, >> >> u32 ocr, >> >> mmc_card_set_ddr_mode(card); >> >> mmc_set_timing(card->host, >> MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50); >> >> mmc_set_bus_width(card->host, bus_width); >> >> + } else if (hs_sdr) { >> >> + if (hs_sdr == EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_2V) { >> >> + err = mmc_set_signal_voltage(host, >> >> + MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_120, 0); >> >> + if (err) >> >> + goto err; >> >> + } >> >> + mmc_set_timing(card->host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS); >> >> + mmc_set_bus_width(card->host, bus_width); >> >> } >> >> } >> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c >> >> index a69d269..28fb747 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c >> >> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ >> >> >> >> #include <linux/mmc/mmc.h> >> >> #include <linux/mmc/host.h> >> >> +#include <linux/mmc/card.h> >> >> >> >> #include "sdhci.h" >> >> >> >> @@ -1016,7 +1017,8 @@ static void sdhci_send_command(struct >> sdhci_host >> >> *host, struct mmc_command *cmd) >> >> flags |= SDHCI_CMD_INDEX; >> >> >> >> /* CMD19 is special in that the Data Present Select should be >> set >> >> */ >> >> - if (cmd->data || (cmd->opcode == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK)) >> >> + if (cmd->data || (cmd->opcode == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK) || >> >> + (cmd->opcode == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200)) >> >> flags |= SDHCI_CMD_DATA; >> >> >> >> sdhci_writew(host, SDHCI_MAKE_CMD(cmd->opcode, flags), >> >> SDHCI_COMMAND); >> >> @@ -1684,10 +1686,13 @@ static int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct >> mmc_host >> >> *mmc) >> >> * Host Controller needs tuning only in case of SDR104 mode >> >> * and for SDR50 mode when Use Tuning for SDR50 is set in >> >> * Capabilities register. >> >> + * If the Host Controller supports the HS200 mode then tuning >> >> + * function has to be executed. >> >> */ >> >> if (((ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_MASK) == SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR104) || >> >> (((ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_MASK) == SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR50) && >> >> - (host->flags & SDHCI_SDR50_NEEDS_TUNING))) >> >> + (host->flags & SDHCI_SDR50_NEEDS_TUNING)) || >> >> + (host->flags & SDHCI_HS200_NEEDS_TUNING)) >> >> ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING; >> >> else { >> >> spin_unlock(&host->lock); >> >> @@ -1723,7 +1728,10 @@ static int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct >> mmc_host >> >> *mmc) >> >> if (!tuning_loop_counter && !timeout) >> >> break; >> >> >> >> - cmd.opcode = MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK; >> >> + if (mmc->card->type == MMC_TYPE_MMC) >> >> + cmd.opcode = MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200; >> >> + else >> >> + cmd.opcode = MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK; >> >> cmd.arg = 0; >> >> cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_ADTC; >> >> cmd.retries = 0; >> >> @@ -1738,7 +1746,17 @@ static int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct >> mmc_host >> >> *mmc) >> >> * block to the Host Controller. So we set the block >> size >> >> * to 64 here. >> >> */ >> >> - sdhci_writew(host, SDHCI_MAKE_BLKSZ(7, 64), >> >> SDHCI_BLOCK_SIZE); >> >> + if (mmc->card->type == MMC_TYPE_MMC) { >> >> + if (mmc->ios.bus_width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8) >> >> + sdhci_writew(host, SDHCI_MAKE_BLKSZ(7, >> 128), >> >> + SDHCI_BLOCK_SIZE); >> >> + else if (mmc->ios.bus_width == >> MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4) >> >> + sdhci_writew(host, SDHCI_MAKE_BLKSZ(7, >> 64), >> >> + SDHCI_BLOCK_SIZE); >> >> + } else { >> >> + sdhci_writew(host, SDHCI_MAKE_BLKSZ(7, 64), >> >> + SDHCI_BLOCK_SIZE); >> >> + } >> >> >> >> /* >> >> * The tuning block is sent by the card to the host >> >> controller. >> >> @@ -2121,12 +2139,14 @@ static void sdhci_show_adma_error(struct >> >> sdhci_host *host) { } >> >> >> >> static void sdhci_data_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask) >> >> { >> >> + u32 command; >> >> BUG_ON(intmask == 0); >> >> >> >> /* CMD19 generates _only_ Buffer Read Ready interrupt */ >> >> if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL) { >> >> - if (SDHCI_GET_CMD(sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_COMMAND)) == >> >> - MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK) { >> >> + command = SDHCI_GET_CMD(sdhci_readw(host, >> SDHCI_COMMAND)); >> >> + if ((command == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK) || >> >> + (command == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200)) { >> >> host->tuning_done = 1; >> >> wake_up(&host->buf_ready_int); >> >> return; >> >> @@ -2731,6 +2751,10 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host) >> >> if (caps[1] & SDHCI_USE_SDR50_TUNING) >> >> host->flags |= SDHCI_SDR50_NEEDS_TUNING; >> >> >> >> + /* Does the host needs tuning for HS200? */ >> >> + if (mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_HS200) >> >> + host->flags |= SDHCI_HS200_NEEDS_TUNING; >> >> + >> >> /* Driver Type(s) (A, C, D) supported by the host */ >> >> if (caps[1] & SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_A) >> >> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_A; >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h >> >> index 6e04e10..90af438 100644 >> >> --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h >> >> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h >> >> @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ struct mmc_card { >> >> #define MMC_STATE_HIGHSPEED_DDR (1<<4) /* card is in >> high >> >> speed mode */ >> >> #define MMC_STATE_ULTRAHIGHSPEED (1<<5) /* card is in >> ultra >> >> high speed mode */ >> >> #define MMC_CARD_SDXC (1<<6) /* card is >> SDXC */ >> >> +#define MMC_STATE_HIGHSPEED_200 (1<<7) /* card is in HS200 >> >> mode */ >> >> unsigned int quirks; /* card quirks */ >> >> #define MMC_QUIRK_LENIENT_FN0 (1<<0) /* allow SDIO >> FN0 >> >> writes outside of the VS CCCR range */ >> >> #define MMC_QUIRK_BLKSZ_FOR_BYTE_MODE (1<<1) /* use func- >> >> >cur_blksize */ >> >> @@ -361,6 +362,7 @@ static inline void __maybe_unused >> >> remove_quirk(struct mmc_card *card, int data) >> >> #define mmc_card_present(c) ((c)->state & MMC_STATE_PRESENT) >> >> #define mmc_card_readonly(c) ((c)->state & MMC_STATE_READONLY) >> >> #define mmc_card_highspeed(c) ((c)->state & >> MMC_STATE_HIGHSPEED) >> >> +#define mmc_card_hs200(c) ((c)->state & MMC_STATE_HIGHSPEED_200) >> >> #define mmc_card_blockaddr(c) ((c)->state & >> MMC_STATE_BLOCKADDR) >> >> #define mmc_card_ddr_mode(c) ((c)->state & MMC_STATE_HIGHSPEED_DDR) >> >> #define mmc_sd_card_uhs(c) ((c)->state & MMC_STATE_ULTRAHIGHSPEED) >> >> @@ -369,6 +371,7 @@ static inline void __maybe_unused >> >> remove_quirk(struct mmc_card *card, int data) >> >> #define mmc_card_set_present(c) ((c)->state |= >> MMC_STATE_PRESENT) >> >> #define mmc_card_set_readonly(c) ((c)->state |= MMC_STATE_READONLY) >> >> #define mmc_card_set_highspeed(c) ((c)->state |= >> MMC_STATE_HIGHSPEED) >> >> +#define mmc_card_set_hs200(c) ((c)->state |= >> >> MMC_STATE_HIGHSPEED_200) >> >> #define mmc_card_set_blockaddr(c) ((c)->state |= >> MMC_STATE_BLOCKADDR) >> >> #define mmc_card_set_ddr_mode(c) ((c)->state |= >> >> MMC_STATE_HIGHSPEED_DDR) >> >> #define mmc_sd_card_set_uhs(c) ((c)->state |= >> >> MMC_STATE_ULTRAHIGHSPEED) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h >> >> index a3ac9c4..20551f5 100644 >> >> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h >> >> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h >> >> @@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ struct mmc_ios { >> >> #define MMC_SDR_MODE 0 >> >> #define MMC_1_2V_DDR_MODE 1 >> >> #define MMC_1_8V_DDR_MODE 2 >> >> +#define MMC_1_2V_SDR_MODE 3 >> >> +#define MMC_1_8V_SDR_MODE 4 >> >> >> >> unsigned char signal_voltage; /* signalling voltage >> >> (1.8V or 3.3V) */ >> >> >> >> @@ -242,6 +244,10 @@ struct mmc_host { >> >> #define MMC_CAP2_CACHE_CTRL (1 << 1) /* Allow cache control >> */ >> >> #define MMC_CAP2_POWEROFF_NOTIFY (1 << 2) /* Notify poweroff >> >> supported */ >> >> #define MMC_CAP2_NO_MULTI_READ (1 << 3) /* Multiblock >> reads >> >> don't work */ >> >> +#define MMC_CAP2_HS200 (1 << 4) /* Host >> supports >> > HS200 mode >> >> */ >> > >> > Why is this cap required? You have already defined this 2 caps >> > MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_8V_SDR & MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_2V_SDR which should be >> enough. >> > >> >> +#define MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_8V_SDR (1 << 5) /* can support >> */ >> >> +#define MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_2V_SDR (1 << 6) /* can support >> */ >> >> +#define MMC_CAP2_HIGHSPEED_200 (1 << 7) /* Can do MMC >> HS200 >> > Why is this is this cap required? >> > will remove it > > Both MMC_CAP2_HIGHSPEED_200 and MMC_CAP2_HS200 are redundant. > >> >> timing */ >> >> >> >> mmc_pm_flag_t pm_caps; /* supported pm >> features */ >> >> unsigned int power_notify_type; >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h >> >> index 0e71356..af4fa72 100644 >> >> --- a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h >> >> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h >> >> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ >> >> #define MMC_READ_SINGLE_BLOCK 17 /* adtc [31:0] data addr R1 >> >> */ >> >> #define MMC_READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK 18 /* adtc [31:0] data addr R1 >> >> */ >> >> #define MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK 19 /* adtc R1 >> >> */ >> >> +#define MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200 21 /* adtc R1 */ >> >> >> >> /* class 3 */ >> >> #define MMC_WRITE_DAT_UNTIL_STOP 20 /* adtc [31:0] data addr R1 >> >> */ >> >> @@ -333,13 +334,18 @@ struct _mmc_csd { >> >> >> >> #define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_26 (1<<0) /* Card can run at 26MHz */ >> >> #define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_52 (1<<1) /* Card can run at 52MHz */ >> >> -#define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_MASK 0xF /* Mask out reserved >> bits */ >> >> +#define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_MASK 0x3F /* Mask out reserved >> bits */ >> >> #define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_DDR_1_8V (1<<2) /* Card can run at >> 52MHz >> >> */ >> >> /* DDR mode @1.8V or 3V >> I/O */ >> >> #define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_DDR_1_2V (1<<3) /* Card can run at >> 52MHz >> >> */ >> >> /* DDR mode @1.2V I/O */ >> >> #define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_DDR_52 (EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_DDR_1_8V >> \ >> >> | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_DDR_1_2V) >> >> +#define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_8V (1<<4) /* Card can run at >> >> 200MHz */ >> >> +#define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_2V (1<<5) /* Card can run at >> >> 200MHz */ >> >> + /* SDR mode @1.2V I/O >> */ >> >> +#define EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_200 (EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_8V >> \ >> >> + | EXT_CSD_CARD_TYPE_SDR_1_2V) >> >> >> >> #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_1 0 /* Card is in 1 bit mode */ >> >> #define EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_4 1 /* Card is in 4 bit mode */ >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h b/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h >> >> index e4b6935..d9a2222 100644 >> >> --- a/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h >> >> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/sdhci.h >> >> @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ struct sdhci_host { >> >> #define SDHCI_AUTO_CMD23 (1<<7) /* Auto CMD23 support */ >> >> #define SDHCI_PV_ENABLED (1<<8) /* Preset value enabled */ >> >> #define SDHCI_SDIO_IRQ_ENABLED (1<<9) /* SDIO irq enabled */ >> >> +#define SDHCI_HS200_NEEDS_TUNING (1<<10) /* HS200 needs tuning >> */ >> >> >> >> unsigned int version; /* SDHCI spec. version */ >> >> >> >> -- >> >> 1.7.1 >> >> >> >> -- >> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" >> in >> >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > >> > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |