On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:57:16AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@xxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 4:12 AM > > To: Jingoo Han > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxx; > > stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx; yulgon.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx; > > jy0922.shim@xxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:49:58AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > This patch series adds USB OHCI device and initial driver for Samsung > > > S5P SoCs and is based from Linux 3.2-rc1. I have tested on SMDKV310 > > board > > > using EXYNOS4. > > > > This is to be sent through some arm tree, not the usb tree, right? > Right, 1st and 2nd patch are sent throught arm tree. > However, 3rd patch is sent through the usb tree. > Thanks. > [PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add USB OHCI device > [PATCH 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI support to SMDKV310 board > [PATCH 3/3] USB: Add S5P OHCI diver So the third patch does not depend on the first two? If it does, that means I will get build errors in the USB tree when I apply that patch, right? If so, then all three should go through a single tree. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |