On Monday 03 October 2011 13:02:16 Kyungmin Park wrote: > I'm afraid to change machine directory name again. mach-s5pv310 -> > mach-exynos4 -> mach-exynos. > As I remember linus blamed the renaming the file names are happened > frequently at ARM I tend to agree with this. While the new name does make more sense, I would first like to see the bigger plan. If you are eventually planning to consolidate all of mach-s5p64x0, mach-s5pc100, mach-s5pv210, mach-exynos4 and plat-s5p into one common mach-s5p or mach-exynos directory, I'm all for that because it reduces code duplication and work required for the overall cross-subarchitecture single zimage work. Simply renaming something because the name does not quite fit entirely should be done very carefully. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |