Jassi Brar wrote:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/16] DMA: PL330: Remove the start operation
> for handling DMA_TERMINATE_ALL command
>
> On 7 September 2011 12:53, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Jassi Brar wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6 September 2011 17:57, Russell King - ARM Linux
> >> <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:52:19PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Boojin Kim
> <boojin.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >> > Origianl code carries out the start operation after flush
> operation.
> >> >> > But start operation is not required for DMA_TERMINATE_ALL
> command.
> >> >> > So, This patch removes the unnecessary start operation and
> only carries out
> >> >> > the flush oeration for handling DMA_TERMINATE_ALL command.
> >> >>
> >> >> Not exactly. The 'start' is impotent when called from this path
> because there
> >> >> is nothing left queued after the call to 'flush'.
> >> >> pl330_tasklet() is called because that is a common function that
> does the
> >> >> house-keeping acc to what's presently in 'work' and 'done' lists.
> >> >>
> >> >> Though as a side-effect, your patch does avoid doing callbacks
> on submitted
> >> >> xfers during DMA_TERMINATE_ALL - which may or may not be the
> right thing
> >> >> to do.
> >> >
> >> > It is defined that DMA_TERMINATE_ALL does not call the callbacks:
> >> >
> >> > 1. int dmaengine_terminate_all(struct dma_chan *chan)
> >> >
> >> > This causes all activity for the DMA channel to be stopped, and
> may
> >> > discard data in the DMA FIFO which hasn't been fully transferred.
> >> > No callback functions will be called for any incomplete
> transfers.
> >> >
> >> Ok, thanks for the info.
> >>
> >> Boojin Kim, please re-write the changelog to state only preventing
> >> callbacks during DMA_TERMINATE_ALL as the reason.
> >
> > As above, we don't need callback as well start operation in
> DMA_TERMIANTE_ALL command and her patch just removed them for
> DMA_TERMINATE_ALL here. So current git message seems to have proper
> behavior of patch.
> >
> Nopes.
>
> No modification to current code is needed if only the following is to
> be the reason.
> {
> Origianl code carries out the start operation after flush operation.
> But start operation is not required for DMA_TERMINATE_ALL command.
> So, This patch removes the unnecessary start operation and only
> carries out
> the flush oeration for handling DMA_TERMINATE_ALL command.
> }
>
> The patch, however, has unintended good effect of "preventing
> callbacks
> from DMA_TERMINATE_ALL".
> The only valid reason, and which is no way implied by the changelog.
According to dmaengine document, dmaengine_terminate_all() is used to pause
or stop the channel. So, dmaengine_terminate_all() doesn’t need to have the
start operation and callback calling.
This patch is originally aimed at removing unnecessary operations including
the start operation and callback call for dmaengine_terminate_all(). And I
think my message pretty expresses the purpose of this patch.
Thanks,
Boojin kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
