On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:07:44PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote: >> Dear Vinod, >> >> Since it came from the RMK, most probably it'll be the best. >> >> But applying patches upon personal timeout seems very dangerous. > > Ehh what? Is there any contention over this documentation patch? I haven't yet read it... even after reading I would object only if I found your patch disturbing enough to disrupt my bowel movements. Which I don't think would be the case. I just observed it is second time that Vinod applied a patch without any ack or prior alert. > >> People not responding doesn't mean only either people agree completely >> or they don't care. Some might be interested but too busy with current tasks >> that they need time to check... please make some policy for such cases. >> >> It already happened with the patch from Rob, which you probably have to >> revert. >> >> IMHO, if nobody replied, maybe you could first ack the patch and wait >> for, say a week, before applying? >> That way people will know they have to hurry if they care otherwise >> the patch is going upstream as such. > > A week is far too long. That's how patches get lost and missed. > He may decide to wait shorter, but imho a week after the first ack isn't that long. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |