Hi Every one,
1. Both S5P6440 and S5P6450 uses PLL90XX for EPLL.
However, the same epll_ops is duplicated in the following files
arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6440.c
arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6450.c
Please find attached patch which moves it to the common clock.c
Attachment: "0001-ARM-S5P64X0-Move-duplicated-epll-code.patch"
2. Also, S5PV210, C110, C100, 6450/6440 and EXYNOS4 define their own
epll_ops.
The following attachment consolidates the same on the basis of PLL types
"Eg: PLL90XX. PLL46XX, PLL45XX and PLL65XX"
Kindly, review the approach and comment.
Attachment: "0001-ARM-Samsung-organize-duplicated-EPLL-code.patch"
Thanks & Best regards,
Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
On 21 June 2011 16:54, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> S5PV210 and EXYNOS4 uses similar PLL(PLL46XX) for EPLL.
> So, The EPLL set rate function is duplicated.
>
> Note: Moved common code to plat-s5p, as commented by Kukjin Kim.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c | 78 +---------------------------------
> arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h | 3 +
> 4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c
> index feeb27e..7687087 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c
> @@ -1294,6 +1294,7 @@ void __init_or_cpufreq exynos4_setup_clocks(void)
> __raw_readl(S5P_VPLL_CON1), pll_4650);
>
> clk_fout_apll.ops = &exynos4_fout_apll_ops;
> + clk_fout_epll.ops = &pll46xx_epll_ops;
> clk_fout_mpll.rate = mpll;
> clk_fout_epll.rate = epll;
> clk_fout_vpll.rate = vpll;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c
> index ae72f87..dd77c2c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c
> @@ -979,82 +979,6 @@ static struct clksrc_clk *sysclks[] = {
> &clk_sclk_spdif,
> };
>
> -static u32 epll_div[][6] = {
> - { 48000000, 0, 48, 3, 3, 0 },
> - { 96000000, 0, 48, 3, 2, 0 },
> - { 144000000, 1, 72, 3, 2, 0 },
> - { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 },
> - { 288000000, 1, 72, 3, 1, 0 },
> - { 32750000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 },
> - { 32768000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 },
> - { 45158400, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 },
> - { 45000000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 },
> - { 45158000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 },
> - { 49125000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 },
> - { 49152000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 },
> - { 67737600, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 },
> - { 67738000, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 },
> - { 73800000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 },
> - { 73728000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 },
> - { 36000000, 1, 32, 3, 4, 0 },
> - { 60000000, 1, 60, 3, 3, 0 },
> - { 72000000, 1, 72, 3, 3, 0 },
> - { 80000000, 1, 80, 3, 3, 0 },
> - { 84000000, 0, 42, 3, 2, 0 },
> - { 50000000, 0, 50, 3, 3, 0 },
> -};
> -
> -static int s5pv210_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
> -{
> - unsigned int epll_con, epll_con_k;
> - unsigned int i;
> -
> - /* Return if nothing changed */
> - if (clk->rate == rate)
> - return 0;
> -
> - epll_con = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON);
> - epll_con_k = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON1);
> -
> - epll_con_k &= ~PLL46XX_KDIV_MASK;
> - epll_con &= ~(1 << 27 |
> - PLL46XX_MDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT |
> - PLL46XX_PDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT |
> - PLL46XX_SDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT);
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div); i++) {
> - if (epll_div[i][0] == rate) {
> - epll_con_k |= epll_div[i][5] << 0;
> - epll_con |= (epll_div[i][1] << 27 |
> - epll_div[i][2] << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT |
> - epll_div[i][3] << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT |
> - epll_div[i][4] << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT);
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div)) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Invalid Clock EPLL Frequency\n",
> - __func__);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - __raw_writel(epll_con, S5P_EPLL_CON);
> - __raw_writel(epll_con_k, S5P_EPLL_CON1);
> -
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "EPLL Rate changes from %lu to %lu\n",
> - clk->rate, rate);
> -
> - clk->rate = rate;
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static struct clk_ops s5pv210_epll_ops = {
> - .set_rate = s5pv210_epll_set_rate,
> - .get_rate = s5p_epll_get_rate,
> -};
> -
> void __init_or_cpufreq s5pv210_setup_clocks(void)
> {
> struct clk *xtal_clk;
> @@ -1075,7 +999,7 @@ void __init_or_cpufreq s5pv210_setup_clocks(void)
>
> /* Set functions for clk_fout_epll */
> clk_fout_epll.enable = s5p_epll_enable;
> - clk_fout_epll.ops = &s5pv210_epll_ops;
> + clk_fout_epll.ops = &pll46xx_epll_ops;
>
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: registering clocks\n", __func__);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c
> index 02af235..2a4678d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> #include <mach/regs-clock.h>
>
> #include <plat/clock.h>
> +#include <plat/pll.h>
> #include <plat/clock-clksrc.h>
> #include <plat/s5p-clock.h>
>
> @@ -203,6 +204,82 @@ struct clk_ops s5p_sclk_spdif_ops = {
> .get_rate = s5p_spdif_get_rate,
> };
>
> +static u32 epll_div[][6] = {
> + { 48000000, 0, 48, 3, 3, 0 },
> + { 96000000, 0, 48, 3, 2, 0 },
> + { 144000000, 1, 72, 3, 2, 0 },
> + { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 },
> + { 288000000, 1, 72, 3, 1, 0 },
> + { 32750000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 },
> + { 32768000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 },
> + { 45158400, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 },
> + { 45000000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 },
> + { 45158000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 },
> + { 49125000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 },
> + { 49152000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 },
> + { 67737600, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 },
> + { 67738000, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 },
> + { 73800000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 },
> + { 73728000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 },
> + { 36000000, 1, 32, 3, 4, 0 },
> + { 60000000, 1, 60, 3, 3, 0 },
> + { 72000000, 1, 72, 3, 3, 0 },
> + { 80000000, 1, 80, 3, 3, 0 },
> + { 84000000, 0, 42, 3, 2, 0 },
> + { 50000000, 0, 50, 3, 3, 0 },
> +};
> +
> +int pll46xx_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
> +{
> + unsigned int epll_con, epll_con_k;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + /* Return if nothing changed */
> + if (clk->rate == rate)
> + return 0;
> +
> + epll_con = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON);
> + epll_con_k = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON1);
> +
> + epll_con_k &= ~PLL46XX_KDIV_MASK;
> + epll_con &= ~(1 << 27 |
> + PLL46XX_MDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT |
> + PLL46XX_PDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT |
> + PLL46XX_SDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div); i++) {
> + if (epll_div[i][0] == rate) {
> + epll_con_k |= epll_div[i][5] << 0;
> + epll_con |= (epll_div[i][1] << 27 |
> + epll_div[i][2] << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT |
> + epll_div[i][3] << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT |
> + epll_div[i][4] << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div)) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Invalid Clock EPLL Frequency\n",
> + __func__);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + __raw_writel(epll_con, S5P_EPLL_CON);
> + __raw_writel(epll_con_k, S5P_EPLL_CON1);
> +
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "EPLL Rate changes from %lu to %lu\n",
> + clk->rate, rate);
> +
> + clk->rate = rate;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +struct clk_ops pll46xx_epll_ops = {
> + .set_rate = pll46xx_epll_set_rate,
> + .get_rate = s5p_epll_get_rate,
> +};
> +
> static struct clk *s5p_clks[] __initdata = {
> &clk_ext_xtal_mux,
> &clk_48m,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h
> index bf28fad..911a20e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h
> @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ static inline unsigned long s5p_get_pll46xx(unsigned long baseclk,
> return result;
> }
>
> +extern int pll46xx_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate);
> +extern struct clk_ops pll46xx_epll_ops;
> +
> #define PLL90XX_MDIV_MASK (0xFF)
> #define PLL90XX_PDIV_MASK (0x3F)
> #define PLL90XX_SDIV_MASK (0x7)
> --
> 1.7.2.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Shine bright,
(: Nav :)
Attachment:
0001-ARM-S5P64X0-Move-duplicated-epll-code.patch
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
0001-ARM-Samsung-organize-duplicated-EPLL-code.patch
Description: Binary data
