On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 03:42:27PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Mark Brown > >> > If iDMA is always a better choice on CPUs that support it then the >> > cpu_is_() macros might be a good way to make the selection? > >> Actually I remembered just after I posted - iDMA wouldn't support capture. >> So iDMA is a bad choice after all. > > So I guess the relevant boards would be better off adding a separate DAI > to allow applications to select the DAI they want at runtime? oops! he is changing platform driver for the secondary i/f which doesn't support capture in the first place. So I think it can be done, though we need to see if it would be better to provide a way(control ?) to userspace to select between sys/internal dma. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |