On 5/31/2011 3:24 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 03:08:17PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
When do you plan to fix the SGI usage as discussed
in above thread. I thought SGI1 usage was ok for OMAP,
realview/versatile and MSM.
I'd like the use of the arbitary SGI1 to fade away, to be replaced with
something a little saner (eg, SGI0 being the first SGI). That just
means you'll end up with a warning about SGI0 instead. Let's just
ignore them for the time being (but please change to SGI0 anyway.)
I mean SGIO. SGI1 was typo. Ignoring that warning isn't good idea.
Platforms which do aggressive CPU offline/online, will keep
getting this noise and hence need to be fixed.
How about my patch which was marking this as a wakeup
IPI instead of unknown one. Ofcourse with wakeup SGI
being used will be SGI0 instead of current SGI1.
If you are ok with it I can send an RFC patch ?
Regards
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
