On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 10:09:55AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 08:47:17PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 11:09:15AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > > The current mainline codes of ARCH_S5PC100 can not support > > > > > suspend to ram. So needs this for preventing build error. > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > Oops, I missed this in my previous patch. > > > > > > > > > > As I know, firstly ARCH_S5P64X0 will support suspend to ram > > > > > then ARCH_S5PC100 will do it. But right now, we need this. > > > > > > > > I'd much rather do this a different way - let me know if this means > > > > the SoC based dependencies can be dropped. Patches to follow. > > > > > > Yeah, I checked your patches. It's ok to me but this is also needed > right > > > now for preventing build errors with s5pc100_defconfig...because there > is > > no > > > regarding headers for supporting suspend to ram. > > > > > > However as I mentioned, the suspend to ram will be supported soon on > them > > > then we can drop its dependencies. > > > > Could I have an updated patch which applies to mainline please? > > From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 09:33:01 +0900 > Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Suspend: Fix build error on ARCH_S5PC100 > > The current mainline codes of ARCH_S5PC100 cannot support > suspend to ram. So needs this for preventing build error. > > Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> Looks fine, but can it go to the patch system please? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |