[PATCH] ARM: S3C64XX: Fix section mismatch from cpufreq init

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The cpufreq init function is referenced from the driver structure and
we don't appear to have annotations which allow us to mark that it'll
never be called after system init, causing the linker consistency
infrastructure to complain. Just remove the __init annotation to avoid
noise from the build.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/cpufreq.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/cpufreq.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/cpufreq.c
index 74c0e83..4375b97 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/cpufreq.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/cpufreq.c
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static void __init s3c64xx_cpufreq_config_regulator(void)
 }
 #endif
 
-static int __init s3c64xx_cpufreq_driver_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+static int s3c64xx_cpufreq_driver_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
 	int ret;
 	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq;
-- 
1.7.2.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux