On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:09:25AM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > I'm not sure, but I don't belive that the clk_ api has > ever been callable from non-sleepable contexts such as > interrupt handlers. > > I would welcome RMK's response (or any other response) > about this issue? We have traditionally allowed it from non-sleepable contexts, mainly because the platforms I've been using it with have had such simple clock implementations that it's not worth artifically restricting it, or the implementation only requires a few us delay after enabling a clock. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |