Seungwhan Youn wrote: > > This patch adds warning about changing EPLL rate to notice that other > driver that controls H/W, which is using EPLL, will has unknown effects > by this EPLL rate change. > > Signed-off-by: Seungwhan Youn <sw.youn@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6440.c | 3 +++ > arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6450.c | 3 +++ > arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/clock.c | 3 +++ > arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c | 3 +++ > 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6440.c b/arch/arm/mach- > s5p64x0/clock-s5p6440.c > index 1e3f517..0b539d5 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6440.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/clock-s5p6440.c > @@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ static int s5p6440_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long > rate) > __raw_writel(epll_con, S5P_EPLL_CON); > __raw_writel(epll_con_k, S5P_EPLL_CON_K); > > + printk(KERN_WARNING "EPLL Rate changes from %lu to %lu\n", > + clk->rate, rate); Do we really need KERN_WARNING here? How about just KERN_INFO?...In my opinion, to change EPLL value seems to be nearer 'information' message more than 'warning'. (others, same) Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |