Hi all, I know that there is another S5PV210 CPUFREQ patch from Mr. Ham. But, That patchset seems to have unclear part. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-August/023626.htm l The part of 'CONFIG_PM' is unclear and still have PM support part. So, I think that this patch is more suitable for S5PV210/S5PC110 CPUFREQ in the mainline. because this patch implemented basic pm functionality and already tested on smdkv210 board. Thanks and regards, S.B. Kim > on Monday, September 20, 2010 3:05 PM, Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This patch adds CPUFREQ for S5PV210/S5PC110. > > Changes since v1: > > - Added MOUT_DMC0 and SCLK_DMC0 for checking the dmc0 clock in CPUFREQ > driver. > - Removed hardcoding of DRAM refresh counter. > - Added to calculate refresh counter function based on DRAM operation freq. > > [PATCH v2 1/6] ARM: S5PV210: Add DMC map_desc table for supporting DMC > access > [PATCH v2 2/6] ARM: S5PV210: Add struct clk_ops for clk_fout_apll > [PATCH v2 3/6] ARM: S5PV210: Add MOUT_DMC0 and SCLK_DMC0 clocks > [PATCH v2 4/6] ARM: S5PV210: Add Register definition for CMU > [PATCH v2 5/6] ARM: S5PV210: Add support CPUFREQ > [PATCH v2 6/6] ARM: S5PV210: Update Kconfig and Makefile for supporting > CPUFREQ driver > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung- > soc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html