On 20/09/10 23:00, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> Currently the {set,get}_pull callbacks of the s3c24xx_gpiocfg_default structure
> are not initalized for the s3c2442 cpu type. This results in a NULL-pointer
> deref upon calling s3c_gpio_setpull.
>
> The s3c2442 has pulldowns instead of pullups compared to the s3c2440.
> The method of controlling them is the same though.
> So this patch modifies the existing s3c_gpio_{get,set}pull_1up helper functions
> to take an additional parameter deciding whether the pin has a pullup or
> pulldown.
> The s3c_gpio_{get,set}pull_1{down,up} functions then wrap that functions passing
> either S3C_GPIO_PULL_UP or S3C_GPIO_PULL_DOWN.
>
> Furthermore this patch sets up the s3c24xx_gpiocfg_default.{get,set}_pull fields
> in the s3c2442 cpu init function to the new pulldown helper functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Initial reading looks ok, will see about adding it to my -next tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
