First thank you for posting the patches. but I'm worry about sending the same feature patches from different divisions. I'm not sure you're talking with kgene. but there are some codes posted by Mr. Ham and get feedback and reviewed with kgene. http://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung/shortlog/refs/heads/cpufreq To kgene, One code from DMC(me), another code from System LSI(you). then which codes do you pick up and apply to mainline? and what's rules or principles? Thank you, Kyungmin Park On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Jaecheol Lee <jc.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This patch adds CPUFREQ for S5PV210/S5PC110. > > [PATCH 1/5] ARM: S5PV210: Add support DMC map_desc table > [PATCH 2/5] ARM: S5PV210: Add struct clk_ops for clk_fout_apll > [PATCH 3/5] ARM: S5PV210: Add Register definition for CMU > [PATCH 4/5] ARM: S5PV210: Add support CPUFREQ > [PATCH 5/5] ARM: S5PV210: Update Kconfig and Makefile for supporting CPUFREQ driver > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |