2010/9/8 Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On 07/09/10 06:29, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> From: Changhwan Youn <chaos.youn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> This patch changes RTC initialization method on probe() as
>> per Wan ZongShun's suggestion. The 'rtc_valid_tm(tm)' can
>> check whether RTC BCD is valid or not.
>>
Hi Kukjin,
I think you misunderstood my meaning.
You only need add the ''rtc_valid_tm' checking in s3c_rtc_gettime()
function as following patch.
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
index a0d3ec8..270842c 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ static int s3c_rtc_gettime(struct device *dev,
struct rtc_time *rtc_tm)
rtc_tm->tm_year += 100;
rtc_tm->tm_mon -= 1;
- return 0;
+ return rtc_valid_tm(rtc_tm);
}
static int s3c_rtc_settime(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
--
1.6.3.3
>> And should be changed the method of check because previous
>> method cannot validate RTC BCD registers properly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn <chaos.youn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
>> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
>> index c078548..7f15073 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
>> @@ -458,8 +458,8 @@ static int __devexit s3c_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
>> static int __devinit s3c_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct rtc_device *rtc;
>> + struct rtc_time rtc_tm;
>> struct resource *res;
>> - unsigned int tmp, i;
>> int ret;
>>
>> pr_debug("%s: probe=%p\n", __func__, pdev);
>> @@ -540,11 +540,17 @@ static int __devinit s3c_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> /* Check RTC Time */
>>
>> - for (i = S3C2410_RTCSEC; i <= S3C2410_RTCYEAR; i += 0x4) {
>> - tmp = readb(s3c_rtc_base + i);
>> + s3c_rtc_gettime(NULL, &rtc_tm);
>>
>> - if ((tmp & 0xf) > 0x9 || ((tmp >> 4) & 0xf) > 0x9)
>> - writeb(0, s3c_rtc_base + i);
>> + if (rtc_valid_tm(&rtc_tm)) {
>> + rtc_tm.tm_year = 100;
>> + rtc_tm.tm_mon = 0;
>> + rtc_tm.tm_mday = 1;
>> + rtc_tm.tm_hour = 0;
>> + rtc_tm.tm_min = 0;
>> + rtc_tm.tm_sec = 0;
>> +
>> + s3c_rtc_settime(NULL, &rtc_tm);
>
> I think a dev_warn() in this path is good to alert the user
> to bad things happening, esp if the system should have a valid
> time, it marks he posibility the rtc battery has gone.
>
>
--
*linux-arm-kernel mailing list
mail addr:linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
you can subscribe by:
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
* linux-arm-NUC900 mailing list
mail addr:NUC900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
main web: https://groups.google.com/group/NUC900
you can subscribe it by sending me mail:
mcuos.com@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
