Re: [PATCH] regulators: add support max8952 regulator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 10:15:24AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:

> +	ret2 = max8649_reg_read(info->i2c, MAX8649_CHIP_ID2);
> +	if (ret2 < 0) {
> +		dev_err(info->dev, "Failed to detect ID of %s:%d\n",
> +			id->name, ret2);
>  		goto out;
>  	}

If the read fails you'll not set an error code when you jump to out so
the probe will report success.  It might be clearer to have separate id
variables which you store the read values into if they're OK, just from
a legibility point of view.

> -	dev_info(info->dev, "Detected MAX8649 (ID:%x)\n", ret);
> +	dev_info(info->dev, "Detected %s (ID:%x %x)\n", id->name, ret, ret2);
> +
> +	info->type = id->driver_data;

It'd be nice to check that the type that was supplied matches the ID
read from the chip in case the user got things wrong, just for
defensiveness.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux