Kyungmin Park wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Kyungmin Park wrote: > >> > >> " Note: S5PC110 and S5PC210 have same OneNAND driver." > >> > >> Yes I also think it's same device. At least Spec is same. But I heard it > > has > >> some different feature related with DMA operation. > >> I'm not yet receive the official release from LSI. So I can't tell the > > exact > >> one. > >> > >> If it's true. we need to separate it if required. > >> > > No need to separate this stuff. > > It means that no problem to use this commonly for S5PC110 and S5PC210. > As DMA operation is changed, we need to register onenand device > separately like s5pc210-onenand. > to use the different read operations. > I'm not sure why we need separate platform data even though changed DMA operation. Anyway, maybe you received information that we can use this on S5PC110 and S5PC210. > > > > But...I will check it again before applying. > > > >> Thank you, > >> Kyungmin Park > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Kukjin Kim [mailto:kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx] > >> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 9:07 AM > >> To: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Cc: ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx; Kukjin Kim; Kyungmin Park > >> Subject: [PATCH RE-SEND] ARM: S5P: Move OneNAND device definitions in > >> plat-s5p > >> > >> This patch moves OneNAND device definitions from mach-s5pv210 to plat-s5p > >> so that can support it commonly. > >> > >> Note: S5PC110 and S5PC210 have same OneNAND driver. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Kyungmin Park <Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- (snip) Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |