Hello, On Wednesday, August 11, 2010 2:40 PM Ameya Palande wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 14:03 +0200, ext Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to start the discussion on the redesign of the way the > > Samsung platform devices are defined. The current solution has some > > important disadvantages that blocks the further kernel development. > > Forgive me about my ignorance about device tables, but I was wondering > if there is any similarity between device tables and Simple Firmware > Interface tables which are already in mainline? Well, this will be a funny discussion of two ignoramuses, as I know almost nothing about Simple Firmware Interface. However I've read briefly about it and I see that SFI device tables are something that is being defined at a boot loader level. Current mainline kernel for Samsung SoC already contains definitions for many devices (well, they should be called 'integrated peripherals' in fact). The boot loader provides only a very basic information to kernel (just the machine id, cpu type, amount of memory and kernel command line). No other information (especially about any device detected in the system) is provided. The proposed device-table approach for Samsung SoC is just the other (imho more convenient and more powerful) way of defining the platform devices and their resources for the Samsung integrated peripherals. Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski Samsung Poland R&D Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |