Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: MAX8998: set_voltage bugfix. ramp_up delay and min/max voltage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 08:07 +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> From: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Two issues are addressed for max8998_set_voltage function.
> 
> 1. Min/Max Voltage.
> 
> 	max8998_set_voltage had been using the voltage value of
> 
> 	min ( voltage[i] >= max_vol , i )
> 
> 	This is corrected to use:
> 
> 	min ( voltage[i] >= min_vol , i )
> 
> 2. Ramp Up Delay.
> 
> 	max8998_set_voltage should provide delay for BUCK1/2
> if ENRAMP is on. It reads RAMP value from ONOFF4 register to determine
> RAMP delay length. However, when max8998_set_voltage's new voltage is
> lower than the previous, we don't care because it does not deteriorate
> the stability.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - rebased onto latest regulator-for-next tree

Applied. Btw, please run checkpatch and/or cleanpatch before submitting
next time as this patch contained some trailing white space.

Thanks

Liam
-- 
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux